Asia Cup 2022: There was once Pathum Nissanka was given out despite snick not showing a spike as a results of the ball passed his bat.
- Updated: August 27, 2022 10:05 PM IST
|
File photo of Pathum Nissanka.
|
The kick off of the highly
anticipated Asia Cup 2022 between Afghanistan and Sri Lanka was not without its
fair share of drama. The opening moments of the match set the tone for an
eventful encounter, marked by controversy and heated discussions.
As the captains gathered for the
toss, Afghanistan's Mohammad Nabi emerged victorious and decided to put Sri
Lanka into bat. The decision to field first seemed strategic, aiming to exploit
any early advantage offered by the pitch. The excitement intensified when Afghanistan's
pacer, Fazalhaq Farooqi, delivered a sensational first over, claiming two
crucial wickets. Sri Lanka, caught off guard by the swift blows, found
themselves relying on the reliable bat of Pathum Nissanka to steady their
innings.
However, the game took an unexpected
turn in the following over. Nissanka, facing the deliveries of Naveen-ul-Haq,
fell victim to a contentious caught-behind decision on the last ball of the
over. The on-field umpire wasted no time in raising his finger, indicating the
dismissal. This prompted Nissanka to immediately call for a review, a decision
that would prove to be pivotal in the unfolding drama.
Replays on the giant screen and
television sets showed only a faint disturbance on the snicko, suggesting that
Nissanka might have escaped a genuine edge. The anticipation in the stadium
grew as fans and players alike awaited the third umpire's decision. It appeared
that Nissanka might have received a fortunate reprieve.
However, to the dismay of Nissanka,
Sri Lanka's captain Dasun Shanaka, and head coach Chris Silverwood in the
dugout, the third umpire chose to stick with the on-field decision. Despite the
minimal evidence of a snick on the ultra-edge technology, the original decision
stood, and Nissanka had to make the long walk back to the pavilion.
The controversial decision
immediately ignited a storm on social media, with cricket enthusiasts
expressing their disbelief and frustration. Prominent Sri Lankan commentator
and former club cricketer Roshan Abeysinghe took to Twitter to voice his
opinion, stating, "Never saw any spike on the ultra edge re Pathum
Nissanka's review. Horrible decision by the 3rd Umpire Jayaraman." Another
user questioned the integrity of the decision, tweeting, "Would be
interested to see what the explanation for that Nissanka decision is. No way
you can say ultra edge gave any evidence to suggest there was a nick."
The widespread criticism on social
media reflected the sentiments of fans who felt that the decision had been
unjust. The inconsistency in umpiring decisions during the match became a focal
point of discussion, raising questions about the effectiveness of technology in
aiding the decision-making process.
Despite the controversy, the game
continued, and Sri Lanka found themselves unable to recover from the early
setbacks. Fazalhaq Farooqi continued his impressive bowling performance,
finishing with three wickets to his name. Mujeeb ur Rahman and Mohammad Nabi
also contributed significantly, taking two wickets each. The Sri Lankan batting
lineup crumbled under the pressure, eventually being bowled out for a mere 105
runs.
The match, which had started with
high expectations, will be remembered not only for the on-field action but also
for the contentious decision that stirred emotions both on the field and across
social media platforms. The Asia Cup 2022 had truly begun with a bang, leaving
fans eager for more thrilling encounters and, undoubtedly, more controversial
moments in the days to come.
0 Comments